Tolmacheva E. Early Photographic Documents and Ethnographic Discourse: The Photographic Heritage of William Carrick in the Collection of the MAE RAS

E. Tolmacheva
Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the RAS
St. Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: 0000-0002-8715-359x
E-mail: toek@kunstkamera.ru

 

 Download  |  Go to Issue #1. 2026

 

ABSTRACT. The study of ethnographic photographic documents has become an established field of scholarly inquiry. Researchers, however, often confront a vast body of visual sources that, at first glance, appear to record historical reality directly, while the verification and interpretation of the information they convey remain highly problematic. An ethnographic photograph may be approached as an intertextual source, through perceptual analysis, or through other theoretical frameworks; in all cases, its study requires interdisciplinary knowledge drawn from multiple fields. Early photographic documents dating from the 1860s to the 1880s present particular challenges for ethnographic research. Although they are frequently assigned the status of ethnographic sources, their expressive strategies tend to privilege cultural exoticism over the precise recording of scientific facts. As a case study, this article examines the photographic collection of William Carrick preserved in the holdings of the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The specificity of Carrick’s work as a Russian photographer lies in his being among the first to document the population of European Russia while simultaneously reflecting Narodist ideas in his imagery. His photographs, grounded in representations of folk life, construct a composite image of a multinational empire. Carrick’s legacy demonstrates how visual images of national culture, seemingly familiar and easily intelligible, can generate distorted understandings of the past, entering mass consciousness and solidifying into iconic clichés through which later generations interpret historical culture.

 

KEYWORDS: ethnographic studies, visual anthropology, source studies, museum collection, photographic document, photographic archive

 

DOI 10.31250/2618-8600-2026-1(31)-152-177
UDC 39 (=352.41) (470.621)

 

REFERENCES 

  • Anthropology and Photography 1860–1920. London: Royal Anthropological Institute, 1992, 268 p. (In English).
  • Bazhak Q. Istoriya fotografii. Vozniknoveniye izobrazheniya [The history of photography. The appearance of the image]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2006, 159 p. (In Russian).
  • Barthes R. Camera lucida. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1997, 224 p. (In Russian).
  • Clifford J. [On ethnographic allegory]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review], 2014, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 94–125. (In Russian).
  • Eshbi F. [From W. Carrick’s “Simbirsk cycle”]. Sovetskoye foto [Soviet photo], 1978, no. 12, pp. 28–29. (In Russian).
  • Foucault M. Arkheologiya znaniya [Archaeology of knowledge]. St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., 2004, 416 p. (In Russian).
  • Kagan M. [Once again about documentaries and artistry]. Sovetskoye foto [Soviet photo], 1981, no. 3, p. 25. (In Russian).
  • Krauss R. Fotograficheskoye: opyt teorii raskhozhdeniy [The Photographic: For a theory of deviations]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2014, 304 p. (In Russian).
  • Nurkova V. V. Zerkalo s pamyat’yu: fenomen fotografii: kul’turno-istoricheskiy analiz [Mirror with memory: the phenomenon of photography: cultural and historical analysis]. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2006, 287 p. (In Russian).
  • Pink S. Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2001, 208 p. (In English).
  • Saburova T. [Russian photographer from Edinburgh]. Mir muzeya [The World of museum], 1996, no. 4 (150), pp. 56–63. (In Russian).
  • Soboleva E. S. [Illustrative Museum collections as an ethnographic source (using the example of the Indonesian foundation MAE]. 285 let Peterburgskoy Kunstkamere [285 years of the St. Petersburg Kunstkamera]. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN Publ., 2000, pp. 190–195, (Collection of MAE; vol. 48). (In Russian).
  • Schneider T. D. The role of archived photographs in Native California archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 2007, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 49–71. (In English).
  • Vartanov A. [Documentary forms in art]. Fotografiya: problemy poetiki [Photography: problems of poetics]. Moscow: URSS: LKI Publ., 2008, pp. 15–35. (In Russian).
  • Zubova I. L., Lipatova N. V., Rusin D. V., Romanov V. V. [Photography as a social process (on the example of the works of W. Carrick and L. Lazarev). Vestnik NII gumanitarnykh nauk pri pravitel’stve Respubliki Mordoviya [Bulletin of the Research Institute of Humanities by the Government of the Republic of Mordovia], 2020, no. 1 (53), pp. 135–143. (In Russian).