Avdashkin A. The Kyrgyz in the Southern Urals: Between Local Groups and the Host Community

A. Avdashkin
South Ural State University
Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0001-8169-2755
E-mail: adrianmaricka@mail.ru


  Download  |  Go to Issue #4. 2021


ABSTRACT. Migration from the Central Asia forms transboundary and local migrant communities that are noticeable for the receiving side. Despite the fact that in Russia the main area of concentration of Kyrgyz migrants has taken shape in Moscow, there are also many Kyrgyz communities in the Urals and Siberia. However, there is still little data on them. Using the example of the Southern Urals, the author examines the time and circumstances of the migration of the Kyrgyz, the main spheres of their employment, and their participation in internal Russian and cross-border migrations. The source database consists of interview materials, participant observation, and statistical data on international migration and ethnic composition of the population. The research toolkit includes transnationalism to see how the local community is embedded in the cross-border mobility networks linking the vast spaces involved in the Central Asian migration. Several examples of migrant biographies demonstrate the peculiarities of moving to the South Urals from Kyrgyzstan. The study has showed that the social ties of the Kyrgyz in Chelyabinsk are structured as follows: (1) contacts established in the sending society, consisting mainly of relatives and neighbors; and (2) contacts linking migrants with the Kyrgyz in general and the host society. These two components differ significantly in terms of economic activity, attitudes towards ethnicity, plans for the future, and other important characteristics of integration into the society. A more confident command of the Russian language and active apprehension of the culture of the Russian metropolis in various spheres strengthens the migrants’ relations with the host society, and gradually, eroding local practices of solidarity, reorients them from returning to their homeland to rooting in the host society.


KEYWORDS: migration, transnational space, Kyrgyz, social ties, Chelyabinsk


DOI 10.31250/2618-8600-2021-4(14)-232-248
УДК 314.7+316.752



  • Abashin S. N. [Central Asian Migration: Practices, Loyal Communities, Тransnationalism]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review], 2012, no. 4, рр. 3–13. (In Russian).
  • Abashin S. N. [Returning home: family and migration scenarios in Uzbekistan]. Ab Imperio, 2015, no. 3, рр. 125–165. (In Russian).
  • Abashin S. N. Returning Home and Circular Mobility: How Crises Change the Anthropological View of Migration. Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, 2019, no. 3 (58), рp. 155–168. (In English).
  • Brednikova E. O. (Non-)Return: Can Migrants Become Former Migrants? Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, 2017, no. 3–4 (56), рр. 298–320. (In English).
  • Brednikova O., Pachenkov O. Ethnicity of the “ethnical economics” and social networks of migrants. Journal of Economic Sociology, 2002, no. 2, рp. 74–81. (In English).
  • Demintseva E. Educational infrastructure created in conditions of social exclusion: ‘Kyrgyz clubs’ for migrant children in Moscow. Central Asian Survey, 2020a, no. 2 (39), рp. 220–235. (In English).
  • Demintseva E. “Migrant Schools” and the “Children of Migrants”: Constructing Boundaries Around and Inside School Space. Race Ethnicity and Education, 2020b, no. 4 (23), рp. 598–612. (In English).
  • Dzhanyzakova S. D. [“Here and There” in the Migrant Stories of Natives of Kyrgyzstan in Russia (the Case of Tomsk)]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniia [Siberian Historical Research], 2019, no. 3, рр. 72–86. (In Russian).
  • Dzhanyzakova S. D. [I prefer to work for myself”: entrepreneurship of migrants from Central Asia in a Siberian city (on the example of Tomsk)]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of archeology, anthropology and ethnography], 2021, no. 1, pp. 157–195. (In Russian).
  • Etnicheskie rynki v Rossii: prostranstvo torga i mesto vstrechi [Ethnic markets in Russia: bargaining space and meeting place]. Irkutsk: Izdatel’stvo IGU Publ., 2015. (In Russian).
  • Faist T. Towards Transnational Studies: World Theories, Transnationalisation and Changing Institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2010, no. 10 (36), рp. 1665–1687. (In English).
  • Flynn M., Kosmarskaya N. Constructing the “rural other” in post-soviet Bishkek: “host” and “migrant” perspectives. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2014, no. 3 (14), рp. 352–368. (In English).
  • Gerber T. P., Zavisca J. Experiences in Russia of Kyrgyz and Ukrainian labor migrants: ethnic hierarchies, geopolitical remittances, and the relevance of migration theory. Post-Soviet Affairs, 2020, no. 1 (36), рp. 61–82. (In English).
  • Karachurina L. B. [Women-migrants in the niche of domestic work in Russia]. Sotsio logicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological studies], 2015, no. 5, рр. 93–101. (In Russian).
  • Karrar H. Kyrgyzstan’s Dordoi and Kara-Suu Bazaars: Mobility, Globalization and Surviva l in Two Central Asian Markets. Globalizations, 2017, no. 4 (14), рp. 643–657. (In English).
  • Kashnitsky D., Demintseva E. “Kyrgyz Clinics” in Moscow: Medical Centers for Central Asian Migrants. Medical Anthropology, 2018, no. 5 (37), рp. 401–411. (In English).
  • King E. J., Dudina V. I., Dubrovskaya S. “You feel sick, you get sick, you still keep going”: Central Asian female labour migrants’ health in Russia. Global Public Health, 2020, no. 4 (15), рр. 544–557. (In English).
  • Kostyukova I. The towns of Kyrgyzstan change their faces: Rural‐urban migrants in Bishkek. Central Asian Survey, 1994, no. 3 (13), рp. 425–434. (In English).
  • Laruelle M. Central Asian Labor Migrants in Russia: The “Diasporization” of the Central Asian States? China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 2007, no. 3 (5), рp. 101–119. (In English).
  • Malakhov V. Why Tajiks Are (Not) Like Arabs: Central Asian Migration into Russia Against the Background of Maghreb Migration into France. Nationalities Papers, 2019, no. 2 (47), рр. 310–324. (In English).
  • Poletaev D. V. [Female labor migration from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan to Russia]. Narodonaselenie [Population], 2018, no. 4, рр. 69–78. (In Russian).
  • Räuchle Ch., Schmiz A. Migrant Economies: Opportunity Structures and Potential in Different City Types. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2019, no. 10 (42), рр. 1766–1787. (In English).
  • Reeves M. Black Work, Green Money: Remittances, Ritual, and Domestic Economies in Southern Kyrgyzstan. Slavic Review, 2012, no. 1 (71), рp. 108–134. (In English).
  • Reeves M. Staying Put? Towards a Relational Politics of Mobility at a Time of Migration. Central Asian Survey, 2011, no. 3–4 (30), рp. 555–576. (In English).
  • Rocheva A., Varshaver E. Gender dimension of migration from Central Asia to the Russian Federation. Asia-Pacific Population, 2017, no. 2 (35), рp. 87–135. (In English).
  • Ruget V., Usmanalieva B. Can smartphones empower labour migrants? The case of Kyrgyzstani migrants in Russia. Central Asian Survey, 2019, no. 2 (38), рp. 165–180. (In English).
  • Sahadeo J. The Accidental Traders: Marginalization and Opportunity from the Southern Republics to Late Soviet Moscow. Central Asian Survey, 2011, no. 3–4 (30), рp. 521–540. (In English).
  • Schiller N.G., Çalar A. Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2009, no. 2 (35), рp. 177–202. (In English).
  • Shiller N.G., Basch L., Szanson-Blanc C. Transnationalism: A New analytic framework for understanding migration. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 1992, Vol. 645, рp. 1–24. (In English).
  • Schröder P. Business 2.0: Kyrgyz middlemen in Guangzhou. Central Asian Survey, 2020, no. 1 (39), рp. 116–134. (In English).
  • Schröder P., Stephan-Emmrich M. The Institutionalization of Mobility: Well-being and Social Hierarchies in Central Asian Translocal Livelihoods. Mobilities, 2014, no. 3 (11), рp. 422–443. (In English).
  • Stepanov A. M. [Moving from Tajikistan to Russia: myths and reality]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia [Monitoring of public opinion], 2019, no. 2, рр. 304–317. (In Russian).
  • Varshaver E., Rocheva A. “Homeland-Rooted” or Acquired in the Receiving Society: How Does the Composition of Migrants’ “Co-Ethnic” Ties Affect Their Patterns of Integration? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2021, no. 22, рp. 347–368. (In English).
  • Varshaver E. A., Rocheva A. L., Ivanov N. S., Ermakova M. A. [Areas of Resident Concentration of Migrants in Russian Cities: Is there a Pattern?]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review], 2020, no. 2 (19), рр. 225–253. (In Russian).
  • Wang D., Hagedorn A., Chi G. Remittances and household spending strategies: evidence from the Life in Kyrgyzstan Study, 2011–2013. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2021, no. 13 (47), pp. 3015–3036. (In English).