Belorussova S. Yu., Danilova E. N., Sysoeva M. E. Hashtages and ethnicity

S. Belorussova - Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg, Russian Federation ORCID: 0000-0002-2069-3452
E-mail: svetlana-90@yandex.ru

E. Danilova - Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ekaterinburg; St. Petersburg, Russian Federation ORCID: 0000-0002-8183-4810
E-mail: danilova@northarch.ru

M. Sysoeva - Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow; St. Petersburg, Russian Federation ORCID: 0000-0002-0553-4998
E-mail: mariasysoeva.kubsu@gmail.com

 

 

 Download  |  Go to Issue #3. 2020

 

ABSTRACT. Having become an essential part of everyday life and a symbol of the modern lifestyle, the Internet transmits and shapes the dynamics of sociocultural changes, the new level of communication and interaction. In recent times, hashtag has become one of the most popular instruments of Internet communication, and it is nowadays not only a means of information dissemination in social media but also a way of identity broadcasting. Ethnic communities aiming to maintain their unity and develop a new communication mode have found in hashtags an opportunity to set boundaries between the Self and the Other, and delineate their own space. Hashtags have allowed the Izhma Komi to single themselves out as a separate community under the endonym #iz’vatas. Kryashens also appear to be highly interested in hashtags and are developing a particular algorithm of their usage both for the creation of an external image of the group and retaining of its inner vitality. In case of the Ubykh, the usage of hashtags not only brings hopes for the revitalization of their community (though only in online space), but also represents a virtual tribute to the gone ancestors and the memory about the lost homeland. For the ethnicity, hashtag is, on the one hand, a means of communication and maintaining the vitality of a community and, on the other, an instrument of defending its distinctive character and competition with other groups. A community shaped by a hashtag has its own rules and traditions, interests and preferences, and strong and weak points, affecting, at the same time, the dynamics of the ethnicity both inside and outside the web.

 

DOI 10.31250/2618-8600-2020-3(9)-33-61
УДК 0 04.7:39

 

KEYWORDS: hashtag, ethnicity, Izhma Komi, Kryashens, Ubykh, virtual ethnicity, cyberethnography, Internet

  

REFERENCES 

  • Agababyan A. G., Sysoeva M. E. [“#Ubykh_Eat”: media strategies for constructing ethnic identity]. Izvestiya SOIGSI [Izvestiya SOIGSI], 2019, no. 31 (70), pp. 73–92. (In Russian). 
  • Ahapkina Ya. E., Rahilina E. V. [Foreword by the editors]. Sovremennyj russkij yazyk v Internete [Modern Russian on the Internet]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2014, pp. 7–13. (In Russian). 
  • Atyagina A. P. [Twitter as a New Discursive Practice on the Internet]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Omsk University Bulletin], 2012, no. 4, pp. 203–208. (In Russian). 
  • Belorussova S. Yu. [#Silakryashen: the virtual life of an unrecognised people]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian Historical Research], 2019, no. 2, pp. 41–63. (In Russian). 
  • Boguslavskaya V. V., Boguslavskij I. V. [Media text and hashtags: digital media transformation]. Gumanitarnyj vector [Humanitarian vector], 2017, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 51–58. (In Russian). 
  • Bough B. B., Agresta S. Perspectives on Social Media Marketing. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2010. 304 p. (In English). 
  • Bruns A., Moe H. Structural Layers of Communication on Twitter. Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014, pp. 15–29. (In English). 
  • Bruns A., Moe H. The Use of Twitter Hashtags in the Formation of Ad Hoc Publics. 2011. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a41/9e801bcb14637580bb3e990e6e444b02b6bf. pdf?_ga=2.226961949.1862187623.1586948137–1526946843.1586948137 (accessed 15.04.2020). (In English). 
  • Bruns A., Stieglitz S. Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 2012, vol. 30, pp. 160–185. (In English). 
  • Chirikba V. A. Rasselenie ubyhov na Kavkaze i v Turcii. Inal-ipa Sh. D. Ubyhi. Istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki. Prilozhenie 2. Chirikba V. A. Ubyhskie etyudy [Inal-ipa Sh. D. Ubykh. Historical and ethnographic essays. Appendix 2. Chirikba V. A. Ubykh etudes]. Suhum, 2015, pp. 395–446. (In Russian). 
  • Fistina E. A. [Hashtag as a means of individualization]. Tendenciya razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya [Science and education development trend], 2018, no. 37–3, pp. 53–55. (In Russian). 
  • Galyamina Yu. E. [Linguistic analysis of Twitter hashtags]. Sovremennyj russkij yazyk v Internete [Modern Russian on the Internet]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2014, pp. 13–23. (In Russian). 
  • Golovnev A. V., Belorussova S. Yu., Kisser T. S. [Web ethnography and cyber-ethnicity]. Ural’skij istoricheskij vestnik [Ural historical journal], 2018, no. 1 (58), pp. 100–108. (In Russian). 
  • Howard T. Design to Thrive: Creating Social Networks and Online Communities that Last. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2010. (In English). 
  • Kan E. V. [Hashtags as a new linguistic phenomenon]. Filologicheskij aspekt: mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. Zhurn [Philological aspect: international. scientific-practical journal], 2017, no. 1, pp. 90–98. Available at: https://scipress.ru/philology/articles/kheshtegi-kak-novoe-lingvisticheskoe-yavlenie.html (accessed 18.04.2020). (In Russian). 
  • Kim H. Ch., Shabaev Yu. P., Istomin K. V. [Local group in search of identity (Komi-Izhemtsy: dynamics of cultural transformations)]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2015, no. 8, pp. 85–92. (In Russian). 
  • Kolesov V. I., Kuznecov I. V., Kuznecova R. Sh., Sysoeva M. E., Huako Z. A. [Descendants of the Ubykhs in Turkey]. Arheologiya i etnografiya pontijsko-kavkazskogo regiona [Archeology and Ethnography of the Pontic-Caucasian Region], 2016, no. 5, pp. 225–251. (In Russian). 
  • Konakov N. D., Kotov O. V. Etnoareal’nye gruppy komi: Formirovanie i sovremennoe etnokul’turnoe sostoyanie [Ethno-area Komi groups: formation and modern ethnocultural state]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 228 p. (In Russian). 
  • Kuznecov I. V. [Ubykhs: boundaries, “extinction”, steps towards revitalization]. Arheologiya i etnografiya pontijsko-kavkazskogo regiona [Archeology and ethnography of the Pontic-Caucasian region], 2016, no. 5, pp. 289–304. (In Russian). 
  • Lim K. H., Datta A. A Topological Approach for Detecting Twitter Communities with Common Interests. Ubiquitous Social Media Analysis, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Heidelberg: Springe, 2013, pp. 23–43. (In English). 
  • Navoloka Yu. S. [Functions of hashtags in modern Russian advertising (based on advertising on the social network Instagram)]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federal’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Southern Federal University. Philological sciences], 2017, no. 4, pp. 145– 153. (In Russian). 
  • Navoloka Yu. S. [Hashtag text as a new text format in the Internet space (on the example of the social network “Instagram”)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice], 2018, no. 12–3 (90), pp. 568–573. (In Russian). 
  • Salazar E. Hashtags 2.0 — An Annotated History of the Hashtag and a Window to its Future. Icono 14. Madrid, 2017, vol. 15 (2), pp. 16–54. (In English). 
  • Shabaev Yu. P., Istomin K. V. Territorial’nost’, etnichnost’, administrativnye i kul’turnye granicy: komi-izhemcy (iz’vatas) i komi-permyaki kak «drugie» komi [Territoriality, ethnicity, administrative and cultural boundaries: Komi-Izhemtsy (Izvatas) and Komi-Permians as “other” Komi]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Etnograficheskoe obozrenie], 2017, no. 4, pp. 99–114. (In Russian). 
  • Shabaev Yu. P., Sadohin A. P., Shilov N. V. [Ethno-national movements in a new socio-cultural reality]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2009, no. 10, pp. 57–66. (In Russian). 
  • Shchurina Yu. V. [Genre originality of the social network Instagram]. Zhanry rechi [Genres of speech], 2016, no. 1, pp. 156–168. (In Russian). 
  • Sysoeva M. E. [Georges Dumezil and Tevfik Esench: half a century of cooperation]. Arheologiya i etnografiya pontijsko-kavkazskogo regiona [Archeology and ethnography of the Pontic-Caucasian region], 2016, no. 5, pp. 171–194. (In Russian). 
  • Terebihin N. M., Shabaev Yu. P. [Chud, Pomors and Komiizhems: re-identification or construction of identities (ethnogenetic technologies in the European North)]. Evropejskij Sever: lokal’nye gruppy i etnicheskie granicy [European North: local groups and ethnic boundaries], 2012, no. 71, pp. 29–59. (In Russian).