Zhivlov M. Areal polysemy ‘earth/year’ in North American languages: historical implications

Mikhail ZHIVLOV — Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor at the Institute of Oriental and Classical Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities, Senior researcher at the Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russia, Moscow)
E-mail: zhivlov@yandex.ru

 

 Download  |  Go to Issue #3. 2019

 

ABSTRACT. The article analyzes an areal polysemy ‘earth/year’ in the languages of North America. The distribution of the trait largely coincides with the cultural region of California. Within this area, the polysemy ‘earth/year’ is attested from Molala in the north to Seri in the south. The trait in question is apparently old in Yuman, Chumashan and Yuki-Wappo, whereas Uto-Aztecan languages acquired it as a result of contact with other families. However, a number of outliers are attested outside California: languages of the Northern Plains and adjoining regions of Great Lakes (Winnebago, Lakota-Dakota, Skiri Pawnee, Menominee), Southeastern Tepehuan and Oaxaca Chontal. These may result from prehistoric migrations. Presence of this polysemy in Northern Plains languages can be connected to the eastward migration of Algonquian speakers from the Proto-Algic homeland possibly located in the Fraser River basin. The case of Southeastern Tepehuan is possibly due to prehistoric contacts between Proto-Tepiman and Yuman languages, with the subsequent southward migration of Southeastern Tepehuan speakers. Oaxaca Chontal belongs to a hypothetical Hokan family, whose other branches are located in California. Moreover, Oaxaca Chontal word for ‘earth/year’ is cognate to words with the same meaning in Yuman and Seri.

 

KEYWORDS: American Indian languages, polysemy, language contact, historical linguistics

 

УДК 81-112
DOI 10.31250/2618-8600-2019-3(5)-167-180

 

REFERENCES 

  • Anderton A. J. The Language of the Kitanemuks of California. PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 1988. (in English).
  • Applegate R. Samala-English Dictionary: A Guide to the Samala Language of the Ineseño Chumash People. Santa Ynez: The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, 2007. (in English).
  • Bascom B. W. Proto-Tepiman (Tepehuan-Piman). PhD dissertation. Univ. of Washington, 1965. (in English).
  • Berezkin Yu. E. [From Algonquian and Athapaskan Mythology. Towards a Reconstruction of North American Ethnocultural History] Otkrytie Ameriki prodolzhaetsja [The Discovery of America is Going on], iss. 4. St. Petersburg: MAE RAS Publ., 2010, pp. 6–96. (in Russ.).
  • Berman H. Merriam’s Palewyami Vocabulary. International Journal of American Linguistics, 2002, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 428–446. (in English).
  • Berman H. The Position of Molala in Plateau Penutian. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1996, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–30. (in English).
  • Bloomfield L. Menominee Lexicon. Milwaukee Public Museum, 1975. (in English). Callaghan C.A. Bodega Miwok Dictionary. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of Cali- fornia Press, 1970. (in English).
  • Zhivlov M. Areal polysemy ‘earth/year’ in North American languages...
  • Callaghan C.A. Lake Miwok Dictionary. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1965. (in English).
  • Callaghan C.A. Proto Utian Grammar and Dictionary, with Notes on Yokuts. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. (in English).
  • Crawford J. M. Cocopa Dictionary. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of California Press, 1989. (in English).
  • Eatough A. Central Hill Nisenan Texts with Grammatical Sketch. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of California Press, 1999. (in English).
  • Espinoza M. D. English/Wukchumni Dictionary, Espinoza.007, in “Miscellaneous papers from the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages”, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7297/ X2W37T98 (accessed: 08.07.2019). (in English).
  • Gamble G. Wikchamni Grammar. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of California Press, 1978. (in English).
  • Golla V. California Indian Languages. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of California Press, 2011. (in English).
  • Hendery R., Roque L. S., Schapper A. Tree, Firewood and Fire in the Languages of Sahul. Lexico-typological Approaches to Semantic Shifts and Motivation Patterns in the Lexicon. Avai- lable at: www.academia.edu/20080949 (accessed: 08.07.2019). (in English).
  • Hewson J. A Computer-generated Dictionary of Proto-Algonquian. Hull, Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization, 1993. (in English).
  • Hill K. C. Serrano Dictionary. Part 1. Serrano-English. Tucson, AZ, May 24, 2011. Ms. (in English).
  • Hinton L. A Dictionary of the Havasupai Language. The Havasupai Tribe, Supai, Arizona, 1984. (in English).
  • Joel D. J. Paipai Phonology and Morphology. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1966. (in English).
  • Kaufman T. A Research Program for Reconstructing Proto-Hokan: First Gropings. Papers from the 1988 Hokan-Penutian Languages Workshop, Held at the University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, June 16–18, 1988. Eugene, OR: Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Oregon, 1989, pp. 50–168. (in English).
  • Klar K.A. Topics in Historical Chumash Grammar. PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1977. (in English).
  • Kroeber A. L. Handbook of the Indians of California. Washington, 1925. (Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78). (in English).
  • Kroeber A. L. Yokuts Dialect Survey. Anthropological Records, 1963, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 177–252. (in English).
  • Mamet I. Die Ventureño-Chumash-Sprache (Südkalifornien) in den Aufzeichnungen John Peabody Harringtons. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2005. (in German).
  • Manaster Ramer A. The Distribution of /s/ vs. /š/ and Related Issues in Aztecan Phonology and Etymology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 1996, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 103–118. (in English).
  • Marino M. C. A Dictionary of Winnebago: an Analysis and Reference Grammar of the Radin Lexical File. PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1968. (in English).
  • Marlett S.A. The XIX Century Seri Word Lists: Comparison and Analysis. SIL–Mexico Branch Electronic Working Papers 008. SIL International, 2010. (in English).
  • Marlett S.A., Montaño Herrera R., Nava L. E. F. La creación del mundo: análisis de un antig- uo canto Seri [The Creation of the World: Analysis of an Ancient Seri Song]. Tlalocan. 2018, vol. 23, pp. 163–184. (in Spanish).
  • Miller A. Phonological Developments in Delta-California Yuman. International Journal of American Linguistics, 2018, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 383–433. (in English).
  • Mixco M. J. Cochimi and Proto-Yuman: Lexical and Syntactic Evidence for a New Language Family in Lower California. Salt Lake City, Utah: Univ. of Utah Press, 1978. (in English).
  • Mixco M. J. Kiliwa Dictionary. Salt Lake City, Utah: Univ. of Utah Press, 1985. (in English). Moser M. B., Marlett S. A. Comcaac quih yaza quih hant ihiip hac: cmiique iitom — cocsar iitom — maricaana iitom = Diccionario seri — español — inglés: con índices español — seri, inglés — seri. [Seri — Spanish — English Dictionary: with Spanish — Seri and English — Seri indices]. 2nd ed. Hermosillo, Son.: Editorial UniSon: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2010. (in Spanish). Munro P., Brown N., Crawford J. G. A Mojave Dictionary. Los Angeles: Department of
  • Linguistics, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 1992. (in English).
  • O’Connor L. Latyaygi — English — Español: A Trilingual Dictionary of Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca. Muenchen: LINCOM GmbH, 2013. (in English).
  • O’Connor L., Kroefges P. C. The Land Remembers: Landscape Terms and Place Names in Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca, Mexico. Language Sciences, 2008, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 291–315. (in English).
  • O’Meara C., Bohnemeyer J. Complex Landscape Terms in Seri. Language Sciences, 2008, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 316–339. (in English).
  • Parks D. R., Pratt L. N. A Dictionary of Skiri Pawnee. Lincoln; London: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 2008. (in English).
  • Pharris N. J. Winuunsi Tm Talapaas: A Grammar of the Molalla Language. PhD dissertation, The Univ. of Michigan, 2006. (in English).
  • Radin P. A Grammar of the Wappo Language. University of California Publications in Ameri- can Archaeology and Ethnology, 1929, vol. 27, pp. 1–194. (in English).
  • Rankin R. L., Carter R. T., Jones A. W., Koontz J. E., Rood D. S., Hartmann I. (eds.) Com- parative Siouan Dictionary. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2015. Available at: https://csd.clld.org/(accessed: 08.07.2019). (in English).
  • Rude N. Umatilla Dictionary: A Project of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and Noel Rude. Seattle; London: Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation in association with Univ. of Washington Press, 2014. (in English).
  • Sawyer J. O. English-Wappo Vocabulary. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1965. (in English).
  • Sawyer J. O., Schlichter A. Yuki vocabulary. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: Univ. of Cali- fornia Press, 1984. (in English).
  • Schlichter A. The Yukian language family. PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1985. (in English).
  • Zhivlov M. Areal polysemy ‘earth/year’ in North American languages... 
  • Schlichter A. Wintu Dictionary. Berkeley, CA: Department of Linguistics, Univ. of California at Berkeley, 1981. (in English).
  • Shaul D. L., Hill J. H. Tepimans, Yumans, and Other Hohokam. American Antiquity, 1998, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 375–396. (in English).
  • Shepherd A. Proto-Wintun. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, 2006. (in English).
  • Shipley W. F. Maidu Texts and Dictionary. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1963. (in English).
  • Stubbs B. D. Uto-Aztecan: A Comparative Vocabulary. Flower Mound, Texas; Blanding, Utah: Shumway Family History Services; Rocky Mountain Books and Productions, 2011. (in English). Tatsch S. J. The Nisenan: Dialects & Districts of a Speech Community. PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Davis, 2006. (in English).
  • Taylor A. R. Comparative Caddoan. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1963, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 113–131. (in English).
  • Turner P., Turner S. Dictionary: Chontal to Spanish-English, Spanish to Chontal. Tucson, Arizona: The Univ. of Arizona Press, 1971. (in English).
  • Ullrich J. New Lakota Dictionary: Lakȟótiyapi-English/English-Lakȟótiyapi & Incorpora- ting the Dakota Dialects of Yankton-Yanktonai & Santee-Sisseton. Bloomington: Lakota Langu- age Consortium, 2008. (in English).
  • Ultan R. Konkow Vocabulary, Ultan.001, in “Miscellaneous papers from the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages”, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1961. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7297/X2CF9N2M (accessed: 08.07.2019). (in English).
  • Urban M. “Sun” and “Moon” in the Circum-Pacific Language Area. Anthropological Ling- uistics, 2009, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 328–346. (in English).
  • Urban M. Lexical Semantic Change and Semantic Reconstruction. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London; New York: Routledge, 2015, pp. 374–392. (in English).
  • Voegelin C. F. Working Dictionary of Tübatulabal. International Journal of American Ling- uistics, 1958, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 221–228. (in English).
  • Whistler Kenneth W. An Interim Barbareño Chumash Dictionary (of Barbareño as spoken by Mary Yee). Washington, DC, 1980. Ms. (in English).
  • Willett E. R. de, Willett T. L. Diccionario tepehuano de Santa María Ocotán, Durango. [Tepehuan Dictionary of Santa María Ocotán, Durango]. D. F. México: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, A. C., 2015. (in Spanish).
  • Zhivlov M. Some Morphological Parallels Between Hokan Languages. Journal of Language Relationship, 2018, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 138–161. (in English).
  • Zigmond M. L., Booth C. G., Munro P. Kawaiisu: a Grammar and Dictionary with Texts. Ed. P. Munro. Berkeley; Los Angeles; Oxford: University of California Press, 1991. (in English).