Napolskikh V. V. Once more on the Nostratic «original home» and interdisciplinary in prehistorical studies

Vladimir V. NAPOLSKIKH — Member of the RAS, Udmurt State University; Kazan Federal University (Russia, Izhevsk; Kazan)
E‑mail: vovia@udm.ru

 

 Download  |  Go to Issue #3. 2019

 

ABSTRACT. The article examines the problems that arose in discussions with colleagues after the publication of the author’s first article on the problem of Nostratic original home and the disintegration of the Proto-Nostratic community (Etnografia. 2018. № 1), which suggested a hypothesis on connection of the Proto-Nostratic with a complex of paleolithic cultures of the “mammoth steppe” in the periglacial zone of Eurasia from the Northern Black Sea to the upper reaches of Lena and Amur, and its disintegration caused by the intensification of the runoff of the glacial lakes along the Turgai spillway and transgression of the Caspian Sea. The first set of problems is related to the inner classification of the Nostratic languages. The author insists on the division of nostratic languages into Western (Kartvelian and Indo-European) and Eastern (Ural-Yukaghir, Altai and Escaleutian, possibly — Dravidian) groups and on the special genetic connections between Uralic and Yukaghir languages within the Nostratic framework and shows the failure of criticism of the Yukaghiro-Uralic hypothesis. The second set of problems is connected with the paleogeographic reconstruction of the last glaciation used by the author for his hypothesis. In fact, there are at least two competing points of view in glaciology: the model of Grosswald-Hughes and the “minimalist” model, which negates the presence of a massive ice sheet and extensive water reservoirs in Western Siberia. The arguments of the proponents of both reconstructions are considered and the conclusion is made about the need to understand the methods of individual sciences in complex prehistorical studies.

 

KEYWORDS: prehistory, Northern Eurasia, Nostratic macro-family, Yukaghiro-Uralic family, last glaciation, glaciology, paleogeographical reconstruction

 

УДК 902
DO I 10.31250/2618-8600-2019-3(5)-109-121

 

REFERENCES 

  • Aikio A. (Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte) The Uralic-Yukaghir lexical correspondences: genetic inheritance, language contact or chance resemblance? Finnisch‑ugrische Forschungen. Helsinki, 2014, bd. 62, pp. 7–76. (in English). 
  • Anfert’yev A. N. [Prolegomena to the studies on ethnic history]. Etnosy i etnicheskie protsessy
  • [Ethnoses and Ethnic Processes]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 62–69. (in Russ.).
  • Collinder B. Hat das Uralische Verwandte? Eine Sprachvergleichende Untersuchung /Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Acta Societatis linguisticae Upsaliensis. Nova Series. Vol. 1:4. Uppsala, 1965. (in German).
  • Grosvald M. G. [Ice Sheets in the Russian North and North-East During the Last Great Chill]. Materialy glyatsiologicheskikh issledovaniy [Data of glaciological studies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2009, iss. 106. (in Russ.).
  • Grosvald M. G. [The Last Great Glaciation of the Territory of the USSR]. Nauki o zemle
  • [Earth science]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 1989, iss. 10. (in Russ.).
  • Hughes A. L. C., Gyllencreutz R., Lohne Ø. S., Mangerud J., Svendsen J. I. The Last Eurasian Ice Sheets — a Chronological Database and Time-Slice Rconstruction, DATED-1. Boreas, 2016 (January), vol. 45, pp. 1–45. (in English).
  • Ivanov V. Vs. [About Roman Jakobson]. Zvezda [Star], 1999, no. 7. (in Russ.).
  • Kassian A. S., Zhivlov M. A., Starostin G. S. [Towards a Probabilistic Evaluation of the Indo-Uralic Connection: Applying Automated Comparison to Reconstructed Sets of Basic Lexicon]. Indoevropeyskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya — XVIII (chteniya pamya‑ ti I. M. Tronskogo): Materialy mezhdunar. konf. [Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology — 18. Proceedings of the Conference in Memory of Professor Joseph M. Tronsky]. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2014, pp. 382–408. (in Russ.).
  • Khelimskiy E. A. [Early stage of the Ethnogenesis and Ethnic History of the Samoyeds in the Light of Language Data]. Problemy etnogeneza i etnicheskoy istorii samodiyskikh narodov [Problems of Ethnogenesis and Ethnic History of the Samoyed peoples]. Omsk: Omsk University Publishing Publ., 1983. (in Russ.).
  • Kreynovich Ye.A. Issledovaniya i materialy po yukagirskomu yazyku [Studies and Materials on the Yukaghir Language]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1982. (in Russ.).
  • Lazukov G. I. [Centers of glaciations on the West-Siberian lowland]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. V. Geografiya [Gerald of Moscow University. Series V. Geography], 1964, no. 6, pp. 31–37. (in Russ.).
  • Napol’skikh V. V. [On the Problems of Studying the Most Ancient Prehistory of Northern Eurasia (Nostratic Macrofamily of Languages)]. Etnografia, 2018, no. 1, pp. 119–142. (in Russ.). Napol’skikh V. V. Ocherki po etnicheskoy istorii [Essays on the Ethnic History]. 2nd ed. Kazan, 2018. (in Russ.).
  • Nikolaeva I. A Historical Distionary of Yukaghir (Trends in Linguistics. Documentation).
  • Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2006, vol. 25. (in English).
  • Rédei K. Zu den uralisch-jukagirischen Sprachkontakten (einige Kapitel aus dem Themenkreis). Congressus septimus Internationalis Fenno‑Ugristarum. Pars 1A. Debrecen, 1990. (in German). Starostin S.A., Dybo A. V., Mudrak O.A. Etymological Dictionary of Altaic Languages (Handbook of Oriental Studies / Handbuch Der Orientalistik). Leiden: Brill Academic Publ., 2003, part 8. (in English).
  • von K. Rédei (Hrsg.) Uralisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Budapest, 1986–1991. (in German).